Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

02-1892-CR State v. Everts

By: dmc-admin//December 16, 2002//

02-1892-CR State v. Everts

By: dmc-admin//December 16, 2002//

Listen to this article

Chad D. Everts appeals from a judgment of conviction for party to the crime of battery as a habitual offender and from a trial court order denying his motion for plea withdrawal. Everts argues that his plea was not knowingly and intelligently entered because his counsel misinformed him of his potential punishments upon conviction. Everts further argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel based on this misinformation. We reject Everts’ arguments. We conclude that Everts received adequate notice of his potential punishments and effective assistance of counsel.

We affirm the judgment and order.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Kenosha County, Schroeder, J., Nettesheim, P.J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Chad G. Kerkman, Twin Lakes

For Respondent: Robert J. Jambois, Kenosha; Michael J. Lonski, Kenosha

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests