By: dmc-admin//December 16, 2002//
Chad D. Everts appeals from a judgment of conviction for party to the crime of battery as a habitual offender and from a trial court order denying his motion for plea withdrawal. Everts argues that his plea was not knowingly and intelligently entered because his counsel misinformed him of his potential punishments upon conviction. Everts further argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel based on this misinformation. We reject Everts’ arguments. We conclude that Everts received adequate notice of his potential punishments and effective assistance of counsel.
We affirm the judgment and order.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist II, Kenosha County, Schroeder, J., Nettesheim, P.J.
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Chad G. Kerkman, Twin Lakes
For Respondent: Robert J. Jambois, Kenosha; Michael J. Lonski, Kenosha