By: dmc-admin//December 16, 2002//
Christopher E. Maas has appealed from a judgment convicting him upon a guilty plea of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, third offense. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously denied Maas’ motion to suppress evidence and dismiss. Maas sought relief on the ground that the arresting officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle.
We conclude that the trial court properly denied the motion and affirm the judgment of conviction.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist II, Fond du Lac County, Weinke, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Christopher A. Mutschler, Fond du Lac
For Respondent: Thomas L. Storm, Fond du Lac; Warren D. Weinstein, Madison