02-1103 Spence v. Kolodzienski

By: dmc-admin//December 3, 2002//

Listen to this article

Thomas and Diane Kolodzienski appeal a summary judgment ruling that they violated the protective covenants of the Golfview Heights Addition to the City of River Falls. They argue (1) the restrictive covenants are ambiguous; (2) they did not violate them; (3) the record discloses issues of material fact that preclude summary judgment; and (4) further discovery is required.

We affirm the summary judgment.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Pierce County, Morey, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: R. Michael Waterman, Hudson

For Respondent: Randall & Roberta Spence, River Falls

Related Content

Replevin-Lost Dog

Clarion Bannach appeals from the judgment in replevin that returned possession of a dog to Leola Voegtline, wh[...]

April 15, 2024

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Eligibility

For fourteen years, Jonathan Todd Morris was the vice president of finance and operations for his employer, Br[...]

April 15, 2024

Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act

After a workplace accident in 2012—for which Graef received worker’s compensation benefits—he continued [...]

April 15, 2024

Sentence Modification-New Factor

Gilliam was convicted, upon a jury’s verdict, of first-degree intentional homicide while armed in December 1[...]

April 15, 2024

Petitions for Guardianship and Protective Placement

Sarah appeals circuit court orders granting My Choice Wisconsin’s petitions for guardianship and protective [...]

April 15, 2024

Insurance Coverage-Definition of “Occurrence”

Meress & Associates LLC (“Meress”) appeals orders of the circuit court denying its motion for summary [...]

April 15, 2024

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event