Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

02-0700-CR State v. Rose

By: dmc-admin//November 25, 2002//

02-0700-CR State v. Rose

By: dmc-admin//November 25, 2002//

Listen to this article

Jon Rose appeals from a judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OMVWI), second offense. Rose contends the circuit court erred in denying his motions to suppress evidence. He argues that Wisconsin’s Implied Consent Law, Wis. Stat. sec. 343.305, violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and that the police may not analyze a blood sample seized from an intoxicated driver without obtaining a warrant.

We disagree and therefore affirm.

Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

Dist IV, La Crosse County, Gonzalez, J., Dykman, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Ralph A. Kalal, Monona

For Respondent: Jessica Skemp, La Crosse

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests