02-0557 Crossmark Inc., et al. v. DeGeorge, et al.

By: dmc-admin//November 25, 2002//

Listen to this article

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the respondent, General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin, has a duty to defend Nick DeGeorge and Food Marketing Services, Inc., in an action brought against them by Crossmark, Inc. The trial court granted summary judgment determining that General Casualty has no duty to defend or indemnify Food Marketing and DeGeorge under the insurance policy issued by General Casualty to Food Marketing.

We conclude that the trial court properly granted summary judgment to General Casualty and affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Waukesha County, Hassin, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Lynn R. Laufenberg, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Robert F. Johnson, Milwaukee; Lee Anne N. Conta, Milwaukee

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event