By: dmc-admin//October 21, 2002//
Scott W. Nagel appeals a judgment convicting him of recklessly causing bodily harm to a child by conduct that creates a high probability of great bodily harm, as a habitual criminal. Nagel argues that the trial court erred by admitting other acts evidence and allowing what Nagel claims was inadmissible expert witness testimony.
We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist III, Barron County, Brunner, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Steven J. Meshbesher, Minneapolis, Minn.
For Respondent: James C. Babler, Barron; Gregory M. Weber, Madison