Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

02-0246-CR, 02-1096 State v. Klotz

By: dmc-admin//October 21, 2002//

02-0246-CR, 02-1096 State v. Klotz

By: dmc-admin//October 21, 2002//

Listen to this article

Gary L. Klotz, acting pro se, appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issues on appeal are whether the trial court properly denied Klotz’s postsentencing motion to withdraw his plea, whether he is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, and whether the trial court had jurisdiction over his case.

Because we conclude that the trial court had jurisdiction and properly exercised its discretion, we affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Winnebago County, Haase, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Gary L. Klotz, Redgranite

For Respondent: Joseph F. Paulus, Oshkos; Sarah K. Larson, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests