By: dmc-admin//October 21, 2002//
Gary L. Stibb appeals from a judgment of conviction of child enticement and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that a juror should have been struck for cause, that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel, that other acts evidence should have been excluded, that a new trial should be granted because of newly discovered evidence, and that the trial court should have ordered an in camera inspection of the victim’s records.
We reject his claims and affirm the judgment and order.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist II, Waukesha County, Haughney, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: David D. Cook, Monroe
For Respondent: Paul E. Bucher, Waukesha; Gregory M. Weber, Madison