By: dmc-admin//September 30, 2002//
Peter Liptak appeals the property division entered in his divorce judgment. He argues that the trial court erroneously included a parcel of inherited real estate as property subject to division. He further contends that the court erred when it included among the parties’ debts their adult daughter’s student loan.
Because the record supports the trial court’s determination, we affirm the judgment.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist III, Oconto County, Jeske, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Steven L. Miller, River Falls
For Respondent: Jeffrey C. Beinlich, Green Bay