01-3186 City of Milwaukee v. Derynda

By: dmc-admin//September 30, 2002//

Listen to this article

Thaddeus J. Derynda appeals from a judgment entered in favor of the City of Milwaukee and dismissing his counterclaim. Derynda argues that: (1) he was denied due process of law because he was not personally served with a raze order and because the notice provision of the raze order statute was unconstitutionally applied to him; (2) he was denied his right to a remedy under article I, section 9 of the Wisconsin Constitution; and (3) the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because mitigation remained a material factual issue.

We affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Flanagan, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: John F. Fuchs, Milwaukee; Paul H. Beard, Milwaukee

For Respondent: David R. Halbrooks, Milwaukee; Robert E. Potrzebowski, Milwaukee; Genevieve E. O’Sullivan-Crowley, Milwaueke

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event