01-2135-CR State v. Defliger

Listen to this article

Robert DeFliger appeals a judgment convicting him of second-degree sexual assault. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. DeFliger claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the information for lack of specificity and on double jeopardy grounds. He also contends that the trial court erred in denying a request for a continuance, that a witness was permitted to improperly bolster the victim’s testimony at trial, and that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Finally, DeFliger argues that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict and that he should be granted a new trial in the interest of justice.

We find none of DeFliger’s arguments persuasive, and accordingly, we affirm the appealed judgment and order.

Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

Dist IV, Columbia County, George, J., Deininger, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Ronald J. Sonderhouse, Brookfield

For Respondent: William C. Wolford, Madison; Steven J. Sarbacker, Portage