Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-3303-CR State v. Norman

By: dmc-admin//August 26, 2002//

01-3303-CR State v. Norman

By: dmc-admin//August 26, 2002//

Listen to this article

John K. Norman appeals a judgment convicting him of six counts of feloniously falsifying corporate documents and two counts of felony theft. Norman argues that the trial court erred by precluding him from impeaching a witness with prior inconsistent statements and admitting the preliminary hearing testimony of a witness who was not present at trial. Norman also contends that the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury and that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his convictions.

We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Oneida County, Fox, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Angela Conrad Kachelski, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Edwin J. Hughes, Madison; Patrick F. O’Melia, Rhinelander

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests