Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-3024-CR State v. Polnitz

By: dmc-admin//July 30, 2002//

01-3024-CR State v. Polnitz

By: dmc-admin//July 30, 2002//

Listen to this article

David E. Polnitz appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after he pled guilty to one count of robbery, with the use of force, as party to a crime. Polnitz claims that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress his confession because he claims that: (1) his confession was involuntary; (2) he was detained for an unreasonable length of time; and (3) his confession was so closely related to a polygraph examination that it was inadmissible under the Wisconsin rule that statements made during polygraph examinations are inadmissible.

We affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Brennan, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Elizabeth Ewald-Herrick, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Robert D. Donohoo, Milwaukee; James M. Freimuth, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests