By: dmc-admin//July 30, 2002//
David E. Polnitz appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after he pled guilty to one count of robbery, with the use of force, as party to a crime. Polnitz claims that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress his confession because he claims that: (1) his confession was involuntary; (2) he was detained for an unreasonable length of time; and (3) his confession was so closely related to a polygraph examination that it was inadmissible under the Wisconsin rule that statements made during polygraph examinations are inadmissible.
We affirm.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Brennan, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Elizabeth Ewald-Herrick, Milwaukee
For Respondent: Robert D. Donohoo, Milwaukee; James M. Freimuth, Madison