By: dmc-admin//July 30, 2002//
Bonny Britton appeals and Charles Britton cross-appeals an order awarding Bonny $250 per month maintenance and refusing to hold Bonny in contempt of court for violating a visitation order. Bonny argues that the trial court should not have imputed income to her or reduced her expenses because her cohabiting boyfriend, William Mason, and adult children live in her home. Charles argues that the court should have awarded Bonny no maintenance because she suborned Mason’s perjury on the cohabitation issue. Charles also argues that the court should have imposed sanctions against Bonny for violating the visitation order.
We reject these arguments and affirm the order.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist III, St. Croix County, Needham, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Julia A. Smith, Menomonie
For Respondent: Barbara K. Miller, Hudson