01-2871 In Re the Marriage of: Gleffe v. Gleffe

Listen to this article

Romayne Gleffe appeals and Dale Gleffe cross-appeals a divorce judgment that denies Romayne maintenance and assigns Dale the debts he incurred after the petition for divorce was filed. Romayne argues that the evidence does not support the trial court’s estimate of Dale’s income and that the court erroneously added her earning capacity to her actual social security income when determining her needs. She also argues that the court improperly exercised its discretion because the denial of maintenance did not achieve either the support or fairness objectives set out in LaRoque v. LaRoque, 139 Wis.2d 23, 406 N.W.2d 736 (1987). Dale argues that the trial court erroneously assigned him debts he incurred during the pendency of this action and should not have used different dates for valuing the assets and the debts.

We affirm the judgment.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Buffalo County, Morey, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Thomas L. Horvath, La Crosse

For Respondent: Laura J. Seaton, La Crosse; Mary Anne Kircher, La Crosse