02-0062-CR State v. Henrickson

By: dmc-admin//July 1, 2002//

Listen to this article

Lee Henrickson appeals a judgment convicting him of driving while under the influence of an intoxicant, second offense. He contends the circuit court erroneously interpreted and applied the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures and, as a result, erred in denying his pretrial motion to suppress the results of the test of his blood for alcohol concentration. The application of the Fourth Amendment to undisputed facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. VanLaarhoven, 2001 WI App 275, ¶5, 248 Wis.2d 881, 637 N.W.2d 411. We conclude the trial court did not err and we affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist IV, Dodge County, Storck, J., Vergeront, P.J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Ralph A. Kalal, Monona

For Respondent: Gilbert G. Thompson, Juneau

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event