01-2606, 01-2607 In the Interest of Thomas Z.P.: State v. Thomas Z.P.

By: dmc-admin//July 1, 2002//

Listen to this article

Thomas Z.P. seeks a de novo dispositional hearing and placement determination based on his contentions that: (1) the circuit court erroneously received into evidence over a hearsay objection a therapist’s written report from a court-ordered assessment and (2) the circuit court relied on materially inaccurate information in the original dispositional proceedings.

We affirm the circuit court’s order denying Thomas’s motion because we conclude that the circuit court acted within its discretion in admitting the therapist’s written report and because we conclude that Thomas has not shown that the therapist’s written report is inaccurate.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist IV, Sauk County, Reynolds, J., Roggensack, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Eileen A. Hirsch, Madison

For Respondent: Maura O. Melka, Baraboo; Sue Mueller, Baraboo

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event