Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

00-3258 Burg v. Cincinnati Casualty Ins. Co.

By: dmc-admin//July 1, 2002//

00-3258 Burg v. Cincinnati Casualty Ins. Co.

By: dmc-admin//July 1, 2002//

Listen to this article

An unfinished roadbed under construction does not constitute a “roadway” for purposes of Wis. Stat. § 346.51, which prohibits the parking, standing, or stopping of a vehicle on a roadway, and therefore does not provide a basis for a finding of negligence per se.

Plaintiff was severely injured when he swerved the snowmobile he was driving, at night on the unfinished bed of a new highway, to avoid hitting another snowmobiler who had moments earlier stopped and turned off his machine, extinguishing the lights.

The circuit court correctly denied plaintiff’s motion for a determination that the stopped snowmobiler was negligent per se for violating either statute; the court of appeals erred in reversing.

DISSENTING OPINION: Crooks, J. “I conclude that the driver of the snowmobile was indeed ‘operating’ the snowmobile as defined in Wis. Stat. sec. 350.01. I would affirm the court of appeals’ decision that stopping a snowmobile and turning off its motor is ‘operation,’ because such actions require the exercise of physical control over the speed and direction of the snowmobile.”

Reversed.

Review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Sykes, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Victor C. Harding, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Gregory J. Cook, Anthony P. Hahn, Wausau

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests