Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-3172, 01-3173 In the Interest of Jeffrey A.T.: State v. Jeffrey A.T.

By: dmc-admin//June 25, 2002//

01-3172, 01-3173 In the Interest of Jeffrey A.T.: State v. Jeffrey A.T.

By: dmc-admin//June 25, 2002//

Listen to this article

Jeffrey A.T. appeals from a juvenile court dispositional order adjudging him delinquent of one count of first-degree sexual assault of a child and one count of fourth-degree sexual assault, and from an order denying postdispositional relief. Jeffrey argues: (1) the dispositional order is based upon a recommendation made in violation of § 938.33 because the court report did not include a written analysis of any less restrictive alternatives; and (2) the failure to include the written analysis of any less restrictive alternatives reflects an improper policy preference for serious juvenile offender program placement in order to save the county money.

We disagree and affirm the orders.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Shawano County, Schmidt, Jansen, JJ., Peterson, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Brian C. Findley, Madison

For Respondent: James L. Thomas, Shawano

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests