Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-3021-CR State v. Huusko

By: dmc-admin//May 28, 2002//

01-3021-CR State v. Huusko

By: dmc-admin//May 28, 2002//

Listen to this article

David Huusko appeals a judgment convicting him of one count of armed robbery as a habitual offender, party to a crime. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that the trial court erroneously denied his defense counsel’s motion to withdraw and testify on his behalf. Huusko also contends that the trial court erroneously allowed an in-court identification by a store clerk and that defense counsel was ineffective.

We affirm the judgment and order.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Eau Claire County, Proctor, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Jay E. Heit, Durand

For Respondent: Glenn R. White, Eau Claire; Sarah K. Larson, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests