By: dmc-admin//May 28, 2002//
David Huusko appeals a judgment convicting him of one count of armed robbery as a habitual offender, party to a crime. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that the trial court erroneously denied his defense counsel’s motion to withdraw and testify on his behalf. Huusko also contends that the trial court erroneously allowed an in-court identification by a store clerk and that defense counsel was ineffective.
We affirm the judgment and order.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist III, Eau Claire County, Proctor, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Jay E. Heit, Durand
For Respondent: Glenn R. White, Eau Claire; Sarah K. Larson, Madison