By: dmc-admin//May 28, 2002//
James Miller appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. The issues are whether certain testimony about Miller’s interrogation should have been admitted, and whether he was entitled to a new trial because the jury was exposed to extraneous prejudicial information during deliberations.
We affirm.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist IV, Portage County, Flugaur, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Maris Rushevics, Plover
For Respondent: Thomas B. Eagon, Stevens Point; William C. Wolford, Madison