01-2665 State v. Williams

By: dmc-admin//May 20, 2002//

Listen to this article

David E. Williams appeals, pro se, from an order denying his Wis. Stat. sec. 974.06 (1999-2000) motion. Williams claims that: (1) he was denied the effective assistance of counsel; (2) he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice; and (3) his due-process rights were violated because the State failed to prove his status as a repeat offender.

We affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Fiorenza, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: David E. Williams, Sturtevant

For Respondent: Robert D. Donohoo, Milwaukee; Francisco X. Vasquez, Madison

Related Content

Termination of Parental Rights-Preservation of Key Objections

Julia appeals from circuit court orders terminating her parental rights to her children, Nathan and Neil.2 Jul[...]

April 22, 2024

Termination of Parental Rights

Ralph appeals from orders terminating his parental rights to his son, Neil, and to his daughter, Peggy.3 Ralph[...]

April 22, 2024

Involuntary Commitment

Caleb appeals an order for his involuntary commitment pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 51.20 and an order for his inv[...]

April 22, 2024

Sentence Modification

Romero M. Watson appeals from an order of the postconviction court denying his motion requesting sentence modi[...]

April 22, 2024

Contract

Aaron Carmody and Nicole Elizabeth Carmody, both pro se, appeal from the circuit court’s order, entered afte[...]

April 22, 2024

Right to Remain Silent-Plea Withdrawal

Higgins appeals from a judgment of conviction for one count of first-degree intentional homicide and one count[...]

April 22, 2024

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event