Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-2120 State ex rel. Harr v. Bertrand, et al.

By: dmc-admin//May 13, 2002//

01-2120 State ex rel. Harr v. Bertrand, et al.

By: dmc-admin//May 13, 2002//

Listen to this article

Daniel Harr, an inmate at Green Bay Correctional Institution, appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his petition for certiorari review of the adjustment committee’s decision that he made a threat in violation of Wis. Admin. Code sec. DOC 303.16 (Register, June, 1994, No. 462). He raises three challenges to the decision: (1) the adjustment committee violated his right to be free from double jeopardy when during his rehearing it imposed an additional penalty of thirty days exercise in his cell; (2) the committee violated his right to due process when it denied his requested witnesses and provided insufficient reasons for doing so; and (3) there was insufficient evidence to support the committee’s finding of intent. We conclude that Harr’s right to be free from double jeopardy and his right to due process were not violated, and that there was sufficient evidence to support the finding of intent.

We therefore affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist IV, Dane County, Sumi, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Daniel W. Harr, Portage

For Respondent: David E. Hoel, Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests