Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-2408 Kinko's Inc. v. Shuler, et al.

By: dmc-admin//May 6, 2002//

01-2408 Kinko's Inc. v. Shuler, et al.

By: dmc-admin//May 6, 2002//

Listen to this article

Craig Shuler, Robert Fenbert and Digicopy Inc. (collectively, Digicopy), appeal a summary judgment holding that Northern Insurance Company of New York did not have a duty to defend them in an action that Kinko’s Inc., brought against them. We conclude that, when all doubts and inferences are resolved in favor of the insured, Digicopy has coverage under the “Advertising Injury” provision of its policy and no exceptions apply.

We therefore reverse the judgment.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Eau Claire County, Gabler, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Michael J. Hanrahan, Milwaukee; Daniel M. Janssen, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Craig W. Nelson, Brookfield

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests