By: dmc-admin//May 6, 2002//
Keith A. Glass appeals from the judgment of conviction entered after a jury convicted him of armed robbery, party to a crime. Glass claims: (1) because the photographic array used to identify him was impermissibly suggestive and unreliable under the totality of the circumstances, evidence regarding this identification procedure should have been excluded; and (2) the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law for a conviction.
We disagree and affirm.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Wagner, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Robin Shellow, Milwaukee; Angela Conrad Kachelski, Milwaukee
For Respondent: Robert D. Donohoo, Milwaukee; Jeffrey J. Kassel, Madison