Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-2989 State v. McGrew

By: dmc-admin//April 29, 2002//

01-2989 State v. McGrew

By: dmc-admin//April 29, 2002//

Listen to this article

Kenneth McGrew appeals from a judgment of conviction for speeding. McGrew makes several arguments: (1) that the prosecutor was obligated to respond to his discovery request and that Wis. Stat. § 345.421 is unconstitutional; (2) that the State has a duty to preserve evidence in civil forfeiture cases and the destruction of a videotape from the citing officer’s car was a violation of this duty; and (3) that he had a constitutional right to a twelve-person jury and therefore Wis. Stat. § 756.06(2)(c), which provides only a six-person jury, violates both Wis. Const. art. I, § 5 and his equal protection rights.

Because we reject each of his contentions, we affirm.

Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

Dist IV, Dane County, Higginbotham, J., Dykman, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Kenneth G. McGrew, Madison

For Respondent: Jason J. Hanson, Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests