Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-2236-CR State v. Arberry

By: dmc-admin//April 22, 2002//

01-2236-CR State v. Arberry

By: dmc-admin//April 22, 2002//

Listen to this article

Julius L. Arberry appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of possession of a firearm by a felon (second or subsequent offense), and carrying a concealed weapon. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Arberry claims: (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction of possession of a firearm; (2) the State should not have been allowed to identify the nature of his prior conviction for the jury; (3) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it excluded two photographs; and (4) he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice.

Because we resolve each issue in favor of upholding the judgment and order, we affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, McMahon, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Michael J. Steinle, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Robert D. Donohoo, Milwaukee; Warren D. Weinstein, Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests