01-1854 City of Milwaukee v. Reischel

By: dmc-admin//April 22, 2002//

Listen to this article

Benedict Reischel, pro se, appeals from the order denying his motion to reopen a default summary judgment awarding the City of Milwaukee $5,000 plus costs as recovery for the cost of razing his property. Reischel argues that the court, in denying his motion to reopen the judgment, incorrectly concluded that he was the owner of the property when it was razed.

This court reverses.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Cooper, J., Schudson, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Benedict J. Reischel, Menomonee Falls

For Respondent: Robert E. Potrzebowski, Milwaukee

Related Content

Replevin-Lost Dog

Clarion Bannach appeals from the judgment in replevin that returned possession of a dog to Leola Voegtline, wh[...]

April 15, 2024

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Eligibility

For fourteen years, Jonathan Todd Morris was the vice president of finance and operations for his employer, Br[...]

April 15, 2024

Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act

After a workplace accident in 2012—for which Graef received worker’s compensation benefits—he continued [...]

April 15, 2024

Sentence Modification-New Factor

Gilliam was convicted, upon a jury’s verdict, of first-degree intentional homicide while armed in December 1[...]

April 15, 2024

Petitions for Guardianship and Protective Placement

Sarah appeals circuit court orders granting My Choice Wisconsin’s petitions for guardianship and protective [...]

April 15, 2024

Insurance Coverage-Definition of “Occurrence”

Meress & Associates LLC (“Meress”) appeals orders of the circuit court denying its motion for summary [...]

April 15, 2024

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event