Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-2021-CR State v. Grubor

By: dmc-admin//April 15, 2002//

01-2021-CR State v. Grubor

By: dmc-admin//April 15, 2002//

Listen to this article

Alexander Grubor appeals from a judgment of conviction of possession of THC with intent to deliver and a related tax stamp violation. He argues that the jury was tainted because the venire panel viewed weapons during voir dire. He also claims that evidence should have been excluded because the prosecution failed to produce it until the morning of trial.

We conclude there was no reversible error and affirm the judgment.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Waukesha County, Haughney, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Jonas B. Bednarek, Mt. Horeb

For Respondent: Jeffrey J. Kassel, Madison; William J. Roach, Waukesha

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests