By: dmc-admin//April 15, 2002//
Jeffrey Kettner appeals the order dismissing his motion for modification of the physical placement of his son, Scott Kettner. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied his request for an update of the psychological examinations completed several years earlier on him, his former wife, and son, and when it refused to permit him to introduce evidence of his son’s placement preference. He also submits that the trial court erred when it permitted the guardian ad litem to introduce non-evidentiary matters.
We affirm.
Not recommended for publication in the official reports.
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Sheedy, J., Curley, J.
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Christopher D. Walther, Milwaukee
For Respondent: Richard E. Reilly, Milwaukee; Kathryn A. Keppel, Milwaukee