01-2387-FT Ruperd v. Ruperd

By: dmc-admin//April 8, 2002//

Listen to this article

Sharon L. Ruperd appeals from that portion of the judgment of divorce which divided the parties’ property. She argues that the court improperly determined the value of the parties’ house as of the time they separated, and that the court erred when it did not award her any interest in Arshel G. Ruperd’s pension. We conclude that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it divided the marital property.

We affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Kenosha County, Wagner-Malloy, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Donald J. Bielski, Kenosha

For Respondent: Terry W. Rose, Kenosha

Related Content

Replevin-Lost Dog

Clarion Bannach appeals from the judgment in replevin that returned possession of a dog to Leola Voegtline, wh[...]

April 15, 2024

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Eligibility

For fourteen years, Jonathan Todd Morris was the vice president of finance and operations for his employer, Br[...]

April 15, 2024

Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act

After a workplace accident in 2012—for which Graef received worker’s compensation benefits—he continued [...]

April 15, 2024

Sentence Modification-New Factor

Gilliam was convicted, upon a jury’s verdict, of first-degree intentional homicide while armed in December 1[...]

April 15, 2024

Petitions for Guardianship and Protective Placement

Sarah appeals circuit court orders granting My Choice Wisconsin’s petitions for guardianship and protective [...]

April 15, 2024

Insurance Coverage-Definition of “Occurrence”

Meress & Associates LLC (“Meress”) appeals orders of the circuit court denying its motion for summary [...]

April 15, 2024

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event