01-2233-CR State v. Cosby

By: dmc-admin//April 8, 2002//

Listen to this article

Jade Lamont Cosby, pro se, appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered after his probation was revoked, for the delivery of a controlled substance-cocaine. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Cosby claims that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective because his counsel failed to ensure that the trial court sentenced Cosby based upon true and correct information; and (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it did not provide Cosby with a copy of a sentencing-after-revocation memorandum so that Cosby could contest any alleged errors in the memorandum.

We affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Schellinger, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Jade L. Cosby, Sayre, OK

For Respondent: Robert D. Donohoo, Milwaukee; Steven B. Wickland, Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event