Quantcast
Home / Case Digests / 01-2722, 01-2793 Marshall v. Teske, et al.

01-2722, 01-2793 Marshall v. Teske, et al.

"[T]he argument that the defendant police officers had probable cause to arrest Marshall for knowingly resisting or obstructing them is absurd. Because we are required to construe the facts in the light most favorable to Marshall, we assume that the officers did not identify themselves sufficiently to notify Marshall that they were police. This assumption ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*