By: dmc-admin//April 1, 2002//
In this post-divorce proceeding, Pamela Wautier appeals an order determining that she is obligated to her former husband, Galen Wautier, for one-half of his debt to his employer. Under the terms of the divorce judgment, the debt was deemed to be a marital obligation. The post-judgment order permits Galen to offset Pamela’s share of the debt against his maintenance obligation.
Pamela argues that the trial court erroneously ruled on her discovery motion and denied her a review of the validity of her obligation under the divorce judgment. She also argues that the divorce judgment should be reformed based upon mutual mistake or bad faith. In addition, she contends that the trial court miscalculated a $9,380.70 payment.
Because the record supports the trial court’s ruling, we affirm the order.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist III, Marathon County, Thums, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Randy L. Frokjer, Merrill
For Respondent: Gregory L. Gross, Marshfield; Ann E. Stevning Roe, Marshfield