Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-1884 Urman v. Barron, et al.

By: dmc-admin//March 25, 2002//

01-1884 Urman v. Barron, et al.

By: dmc-admin//March 25, 2002//

Listen to this article

Kenneth Urman appeals orders and a judgment setting aside a jury verdict, ordering a new trial in the interest of justice and dismissing his claims against D & J Enterprises, Dale Jansen, the Outpost Bar, Capitol Indemnity Corporation and Brian Barron. Urman argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it set aside the jury’s verdict and ordered a new trial in the interest of justice.

We agree. We reverse the orders and judgment and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, St. Croix County, Needham, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Jason W. Whitley, Amery

For Respondent: Timothy J. O’Brien, New Richmond

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests