Quantcast
Home / Case Digests / 00-1751 World Wide Prosthetic Supply, Inc. v. Mikulsky

00-1751 World Wide Prosthetic Supply, Inc. v. Mikulsky

This is so because the phrase "actual loss" in the statute encompasses lost profits resulting from defendant's distribution of defective products incorporating plaintiff's trade secret."Our interpretation of § 134.90(4)(a) does not result in unlimited consequential damages as Voyager asserts. In order to recover for actual loss under the statute, a plaintiff must prove that its ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*