01-1609 Dibbles v. Solberg

By: dmc-admin//March 18, 2002//

Listen to this article

Albert Dibbles appeals a summary judgment dismissing his claim of tortious interference with a contract against Trygve and Tula Solberg. Dibbles argues that the circuit court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of the Solbergs. We conclude that Dibbles fails to demonstrate a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Therefore, we affirm the judgment.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Oneida County, Mangerson, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Keith K. Kost, Rhinelander; Mitchell R. Olson, Rhinelander

For Respondent: Danny G. Graff, Rhinelander; John C. Houlihan, Minocqua

Related Content

Replevin-Lost Dog

Clarion Bannach appeals from the judgment in replevin that returned possession of a dog to Leola Voegtline, wh[...]

April 15, 2024

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Eligibility

For fourteen years, Jonathan Todd Morris was the vice president of finance and operations for his employer, Br[...]

April 15, 2024

Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act

After a workplace accident in 2012—for which Graef received worker’s compensation benefits—he continued [...]

April 15, 2024

Sentence Modification-New Factor

Gilliam was convicted, upon a jury’s verdict, of first-degree intentional homicide while armed in December 1[...]

April 15, 2024

Petitions for Guardianship and Protective Placement

Sarah appeals circuit court orders granting My Choice Wisconsin’s petitions for guardianship and protective [...]

April 15, 2024

Insurance Coverage-Definition of “Occurrence”

Meress & Associates LLC (“Meress”) appeals orders of the circuit court denying its motion for summary [...]

April 15, 2024

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event