01-1921-CR State v. Ewing

By: dmc-admin//March 11, 2002//

Listen to this article

Angelo J. Ewing appeals from the judgment of conviction entered after he pled guilty to the crime of armed robbery, party to a crime. He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. Ewing contends: (1) his 35-year sentence is unduly harsh and unconstitutionally disparate from his co-defendant’s 20-year sentence; (2) his co-defendant’s 20-year sentence constitutes a “new factor” entitling him to re-sentencing; and (3) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to make adequate sentencing recommendations.

We disagree and affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Wagner, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Diana M. Felsmann, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Robert D. Donohoo, Milwaukee; Shunette T. Campbell, Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event