Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

99-1727-CR State v. Bridges

By: dmc-admin//March 4, 2002//

99-1727-CR State v. Bridges

By: dmc-admin//March 4, 2002//

Listen to this article

Jharvan Bridges appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against him. The issue on appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence produced at trial to support Bridges’ conviction for possession of cocaine with the intent to deliver, as a party to a crime.

Because we conclude that there was sufficient circumstantial evidence from which a jury could reasonably have found Bridges guilty, we affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Racine County, Flynn, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Allen E. Schatz, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Robert S. Flancher, Racine; Christian R. Larsen, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests