By: dmc-admin//March 4, 2002//
Gary Ranum appeals a judgment of conviction for driving while under the influence of an intoxicant, first offense. He contends the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying his request for a continuance of the trial so that he could obtain counsel.
We conclude the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion and therefore affirm.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist IV, Sauk County, Miller, J., Vergeront, P.J.
Attorneys:
For Appellant: T. Christopher Kelly, Madison
For Respondent: James C. Bohl, Baraboo