Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-2718-CR State v. Sefton

By: dmc-admin//February 25, 2002//

01-2718-CR State v. Sefton

By: dmc-admin//February 25, 2002//

Listen to this article

Richard A. Sefton pled no contest to operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited blood alcohol concentration. He appeals his conviction, contending that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress. Sefton claims that deputy James Armstrong lacked reasonable suspicion to justify his request to another officer to stop Sefton.

This court concludes that Armstrong had sufficient cause to request the stop and therefore affirms the trial court’s order denying Sefton’s motion to suppress and the judgment of conviction.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Marathon County, Grau, J., Hoover, P.J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Stuart R. Rottier, Wausau

For Respondent: Lamont K. Jacobson, Wausau; Jill N. Falstad, Wausau

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests