Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-1849-CR State v. Formaro

By: dmc-admin//February 25, 2002//

01-1849-CR State v. Formaro

By: dmc-admin//February 25, 2002//

Listen to this article

Thomas E. Formaro appeals from a judgment of conviction as a party to the crime of manufacturing a controlled substance. He filed a motion to suppress evidence seized at his home under a search warrant. The trial court suppressed the thermal image scan evidence as an unreasonable search under Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27, 121 S. Ct. 2038, 2046 (2001). Relying on State v. Loranger, 2002 WI App 5, No. 00-3364-CR, we determine that the thermal imaging scan is admissible because it was obtained in good faith reliance on State v. McKee, 181 Wis. 2d 354, 510 N.W.2d 807 (Ct. App. 1993), which held that no warrant was required. Further, we conclude that the results of the thermal imaging scan in combination with electricity records showing that Formaro used above average amounts of electricity, police observation of fan venting and an anonymous informant’s tip, were sufficient to provide the magistrate with a substantial basis for finding probable cause to issue a warrant to search Formaro’s home.

Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

Dist II, Kenosha County, Bastianelli, J., Brown, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Terry W. Rose, Kenosha

For Respondent: Robert J. Jambois, Kenosha; Stephen W. Kleinmaier, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests