00-2706 In the Matter of the Bar Admission of Heather A. Rippl

Listen to this article

“As we noted previously, in reaching this conclusion we are influenced by evidence of Ms. Rippl’s rehabilitation, as demonstrated by the positive testimonials provided by numerous employers for whom Ms. Rippl worked, describing Ms. Rippl as ‘diligent, trustworthy and hardworking’ and who aver she ‘demonstrated honesty and integrity, and at all times acted in an ethical and responsible manner’. We find these recommendations highly relevant to the question of whether Ms. Rippl can maintain appropriate professional behavior and demeanor. …

“We also considered Ms. Rippl’s strong academic record, particularly in light of the fact that she achieved this academic record while working several jobs and performing extensive community service.”

The decision of the Board of Bar Examiners declining to certify that applicant has satisfied the requirements for admission to the practice of law in Wisconsin is reversed and the matter is remanded.

Board of Bar Examiners; Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Michael B. Van Sicklen, Madison

For Respondent: Thomas J. Balistreri, James E. Doyle, Madison