01-0860-CR State v. Gray

By: dmc-admin//February 18, 2002//

Listen to this article

James E. Gray appeals from a judgment entered after a bench trial, convicting him of attempting to obtain a controlled substance by fraud, and possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. Gray also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion. Gray argues that: (1) the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to establish “intent to deliver” under sec. 961.41(1m)(b); and (2) his sentence is excessively harsh.

We disagree and affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Dugan, Schellinger, JJ., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Patricia K. Flood, Milwaukee; Richard D. Martin, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Robert D. Donohoo, Milwaukee; Warren D. Weinstein, Madison

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event