01-0251 Stockton, et al. v. Haselow, et al.

By: dmc-admin//February 18, 2002//

Listen to this article

Michael Haack, by his guardian ad litem, and Michael and Jean Stockton (collectively, Stockton) appeal from a judgment dismissing their medical malpractice and related claims against Dr. William Haselow and the Wisconsin Patients’ Compensation Fund (Dr. Haselow). On appeal, Stockton argues that the circuit court erroneously restricted the scope of his rebuttal examination of a witness and erroneously submitted a question to the jury which the court should have answered as a matter of law.

We reject these arguments and affirm.

Because we affirm the dismissal of Stockton’s claims, we need not decide Haselow’s cross-appeal challenging the jury’s damages award.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Waukesha County, Hassin, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Daniel W. Stevens, Menomonee Falls

For Respondent: Christopher P. Riordan, Brookfield; Amy J. Doyle, Milwaukee; Jeffrey T. Nichols, Milwaukee

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event