By: dmc-admin//February 11, 2002//
Boyd Pigman appeals from a judgment convicting him after a bench trial for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), second offense. He contends that the Informing the Accused form read to him after he was arrested for OWI was misleading because it failed to tell him that he has no right to refuse an evidentiary test for his blood alcohol content and therefore violates the Due Process Clause of the Wisconsin Constitution.
The conviction is affirmed.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist III, Barron County, Eaton, J., Cane, C.J.
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Catherine M. Canright, Superior
For Respondent: James C. Babler, Barron; Ruth A. Bachman, Barron