Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-2395-CR State v. Pigman

By: dmc-admin//February 11, 2002//

01-2395-CR State v. Pigman

By: dmc-admin//February 11, 2002//

Listen to this article

Boyd Pigman appeals from a judgment convicting him after a bench trial for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), second offense. He contends that the Informing the Accused form read to him after he was arrested for OWI was misleading because it failed to tell him that he has no right to refuse an evidentiary test for his blood alcohol content and therefore violates the Due Process Clause of the Wisconsin Constitution.

The conviction is affirmed.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Barron County, Eaton, J., Cane, C.J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Catherine M. Canright, Superior

For Respondent: James C. Babler, Barron; Ruth A. Bachman, Barron

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests