01-2323-CR State v. Holman

By: dmc-admin//February 11, 2002//

Listen to this article

Dan E. Holman appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of bail jumping. He claims that the bail condition imposed violated his constitutional right to free speech.

Because the bail condition imposed a reasonable and necessary restriction, Holman’s constitutional right to free speech was not violated and this court affirms.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, DiMotto, J., Wedemeyer, P.J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: James B. Brennan, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Robert D. Donohoo, Milwaukee; Michael T. Mahoney, Milwaukee

Related Content

Replevin-Lost Dog

Clarion Bannach appeals from the judgment in replevin that returned possession of a dog to Leola Voegtline, wh[...]

April 15, 2024

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Eligibility

For fourteen years, Jonathan Todd Morris was the vice president of finance and operations for his employer, Br[...]

April 15, 2024

Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act

After a workplace accident in 2012—for which Graef received worker’s compensation benefits—he continued [...]

April 15, 2024

Sentence Modification-New Factor

Gilliam was convicted, upon a jury’s verdict, of first-degree intentional homicide while armed in December 1[...]

April 15, 2024

Petitions for Guardianship and Protective Placement

Sarah appeals circuit court orders granting My Choice Wisconsin’s petitions for guardianship and protective [...]

April 15, 2024

Insurance Coverage-Definition of “Occurrence”

Meress & Associates LLC (“Meress”) appeals orders of the circuit court denying its motion for summary [...]

April 15, 2024

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event