By: dmc-admin//January 14, 2002//
Thomas Henkel appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises a number of issues, including ineffective assistance of counsel, whether the court should have granted a continuance, and whether the court erred by excluding evidence.
We affirm.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist IV, Dane County, Ebert, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Joseph L. Sommers, Madison
For Respondent: Daniel J. O’Brien, Madison; Jill Karofsky, Madison