00-2071-CR State v. Rupp

By: dmc-admin//January 14, 2002//

Listen to this article

John A. Rupp appeals pro se from a judgment sentencing him after revocation of probation and from an order denying his motion for sentence modification based on a new factor. Rupp attacks the validity of his no contest plea, the revocation of his probation, and the sentence imposed after revocation by a variety of claims, including claims that the prosecution breached the plea agreement and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel by each of the five different attorneys appointed to represent him in the history of this prosecution. Despite Rupp’s utilization of the wrong procedure and that he raises many of his claims for the first time on appeal, we consider many of the issues.

We affirm the judgment and order.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Fond du Lac County, English, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: John A. Rupp, Black River Falls

For Respondent: Thomas L. Storm, Fond du Lac; Christopher G. Wren, Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event