Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-0843 State v. Lo

By: dmc-admin//December 31, 2001//

01-0843 State v. Lo

By: dmc-admin//December 31, 2001//

Listen to this article

Following a trial and a direct appeal of his convictions for attempted first-degree intentional homicide and first-degree recklessly endangering safety, Anou Lo filed a postconviction motion seeking a new trial on numerous grounds. The circuit court denied the motion in all respects without conducting an evidentiary hearing. As to each issue raised on this appeal, we reach one of three conclusions: (1) that Lo is barred from raising the issue in a postconviction motion, (2) that he has failed to allege sufficient facts in his motion to raise a question of fact or (3) that the record conclusively demonstrates that he is not entitled to relief.

Accordingly, we affirm the circuit court’s order denying Lo’s postconviction motion. We further conclude that a new trial in the interests of justice is not warranted.

Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

Dist IV, La Crosse County, Gonzalez, J., Roggensack, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Anou Lo, Green Bay

For Respondent: Sally L. Wellman, Madison; Todd W. Bjerke, La Crosse; Susan M. Crawford, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests